Biotic Surveys & Inventories
Beetles and their yeast endosymbionts from basidiocarp habitats
Methods

Home / Introduction / Participants / Basidiocarps as habitat / Insects / Yeasts / Methods / Publications / Literature cited / Proposal I / Proposal II / Mycology at LSU

 Basidiomycete collection  Basidiocarps will be hand collected from appropriate sites where all basidiocarps will be examined for the presence of beetles. We will try to search exhaustively but will be certain to include geographically-broad ranging, common species with long-lived basidiocarps as we have done before; this will provide some measure of comparison of the yeasts and beetles in different localities if we can have basidiocarp as a common factor. This method also will help in evaluating the completeness of the collecting by affording the opportunity for repeated resampling.
Beetle collection  The collections for target beetles have been repeatedly performed at different localities and months. Because we are focusing on the beetle fauna associated with basidiomycetes, direct collecting from the basidiocarp will provide the required host link for the third and fourth components of our chain: yeast-beetle-basidiomycete-fungus substrate/host). Beetles must be kept alive until dissection. Field sites will be in the southeastern United States, Mexico near Xalapa, and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Panama.


Preparation for yeast isolation from beetle
Media
YM agar plate (acidified)
YM broth
2% Malt extract agar slant.
Saline Solution
0.7% Saline solution
Lysis buffer for DNA extraction

Yeast isolation  Basidiocarps will be brought to the laboratory for examination or rearing of beetles.  Once removed from the basidiocarp, the beetles are held on filter paper in a culture dish for several days, so that the gut is cleared partially and surface debris is lost. Beetles are frozen before a 95% alcohol wash for surface sterilization, dissection, and removal of the gut for culturing on acidified yeast-malt agar; the acidified  medium largely inhibits bacterial growth.  An essential step in the procedure is the plating of the saline rinse after the alcohol wash  as a control for surface microorganisms. Only on one occasion has a yeast appeared in a control. Examination of the colonies streaked on agar is performed from day 1, and all of colonies that have different morphologies are purified. A test of this method has shown that usually a single yeast and seldom more than two are isolated from an individual beetle. Yeast colonies are then grown in pure culture to provide inoculum for morphological and metabolic characterization and for DNA extraction. Cultures will be overlain with sterile mineral oil for medium term storage. We are targeting only yeasts that grow in culture in this proposal, and although we do not have evidence that unculturable yeasts are present, we are aware of that possibility.  Characterization and identification of yeasts  We will characterize the yeasts we discover in two ways. First, the prescribed "standard description" for yeasts (Yarrow, 1998) (Table 8) will be used to provide morphological and metabolic data for different isolates. The observations and tests for standard descriptions (Yarrow, 1998) include observations on carbon assimilation, fermentation tests, nitrogen assimilation, growth under certain conditions, morphological observations and a number of other tests. Yeast taxonomists have moved rapidly to the use of molecular methods, not necessarily for phylogenetic studies, but as another method of identification. A data base of sequences (600 bp) for all described yeast species (over 600) has been made available to us, and we will continue to use this method to compare the species we isolate with previously described species (Kurtzman and Robnett, 1998). Recent updates have been sent to us by Kurtzman and Robnett, and our sequences to date have been sent to them for addition to the complete data base.

The isolates in the preliminary study were tested for assimilation of 19 major carbon compounds to provide information to supplement the sequence data for identification. This method has provided us with information to separate closely related yeast strains. Morphological observations will be made at two months after the initial culturing to allow enough time for possible spore formation. When appropriate cultures of non-sporulating yeasts are available, we will attempt to establish mating competence by mixing cultures. Because we were interested in yeast enzymatic activity that might be of use in the beetle habitat, we investigated the capacity of the cultures to degrade a variety of substrates (Untereiner and Malloch, 1999).  One test, the difference in lipid degradation also distinguished closely related strains in one case.DNA sequencing  Sequences will be obtained for all yeasts isolated in the study for approximately 600 bp from the 5’ end of 26S rDNA (D1/D2 region).  We have have used readily available primers for the PCR reactions and sequencing (Kurtzman and Robnett, 1998). After initial screening one or two isolates of each group will be used to determine the entire 18S rDNA sequence (Suh and Blackwell, 1999). The species of previously known yeast-like fungi in Coleoptera, Symbiotaphrina kochii CBS 588.33 and CBS 250.77, Symbiotaphrina buchneri CBS 420.63, Candida karawaiewii ATCC 22994, C. xestobii ATCC 24001, C. rhagii NRRL Y-2596, and C. tenuis NRRL Y-2597, were sequenced in these regions as well and will provide a conserved region for comparison to ensure that we do not have contaminating DNA, often a problem when endosymbiotic systems are studied.

The purified double stranded PCR products were used directly as templates for sequencing with an ABI PRISM™  Dye Terminator Cycle sequencing kit. The DNA sequences will be determined by an ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer. The 26S rDNA sequences will be aligned in the database of more than 600 D1/D2 sequences of almost all yeasts in Saccharomycetales (Kurtzman and Robnett, 1998, and unpublished results) using Clustal W (Thompson et al., 1994). Phylogenetic analysis is designed for identification, but the same process also allows for discovery of close relatives, and informs subsequent sampling. We use the parsimony options in PAUP* (Swofford, 1999) to compare the yeast sequences.


This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0072741. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Home / Introduction / Participants / Basidiocarps as habitat / Insects / Yeasts / Methods / Publications / Literature cited / Proposal I / Proposal II /
Mycology at LSU
Return to Mycology at LSU

Return to Beetlebellyeasts
Last update: 5 May 2001
Questions?